Which legal defenses can be raised against RADAR speed readings?

Raising legal defenses against RADAR speed readings typically involves questioning the validity and reliability of the readings produced by the device. The correct response highlights that defenses can include operator error, device accuracy, or calibration issues.

Operator error refers to mistakes made by the person using the RADAR device, which could compromise the accuracy of the speed measurement. This could include improper handling of the device or failure to follow established protocols for its use.

Device accuracy is crucial because RADAR units must be properly designed and maintained to ensure they measure speed correctly. Defending against a ticket could involve demonstrating that the RADAR unit was malfunctioning or that it was not suitable for use in the specific conditions of the situation.

Calibration issues are also significant, as RADAR devices must undergo regular calibration to ensure precision. If a unit has not been calibrated according to standards, the results it produces may be called into question in a legal context.

These aspects combine to form a comprehensive defense against RADAR readings, as they can collectively indicate doubt about the validity of the speed measurement presented in court.

In contrast, questioning the color of the device or solely citing weather conditions does not directly address the technical and operational reliability of the RADAR system itself. The option suggesting that